Owen Sound: A Four-Year City Business Plan

Home › The Public Scorecard › Chapter 48

The Public Scorecard

Chapter 48Downtown: The Public Downtown Scorecard

8,983 words · Mike Seiler · Owen Sound, Ontario

Open in the reader →

Vote on the proposals, hear the audio, read the reviews, search the whole plan.

In this chapter

A downtown can look successful during a festival and still struggle on an ordinary Tuesday.

It can have:

while still dealing with:

The Downtown Scorecard should therefore measure:

the ordinary downtown.

Not just the special event.

The central question is:

Does downtown Owen Sound work better as a place to live, work, operate a business, visit, walk through and spend time than it did before?

The principle is:

Measure the ordinary day. Maintain before decorating. Track use before building more. Separate perception from evidence. Never claim economic causation the data cannot prove.

48.1Purpose

The Downtown Scorecard should answer:

Is downtown cleaner?

Is it better maintained?

Are more storefronts actively used?

Are upper floors becoming housing or productive space?

Are public spaces used outside special events?

Is it easier to walk?

Is it accessible?

Do businesses understand City processes?

Do residents feel comfortable spending time there?

Are actual safety conditions improving?

Is parking functioning?

Are deliveries functioning?

Are public washrooms available and usable?

Is 2nd Avenue East working better under the chosen model?

Is Civic Square earning its cost?

Are capital improvements maintained after construction?

Are public investments producing measurable public use?

Those questions define downtown performance.

48.2Downtown Is Not One Metric

Do not create:

Downtown Health Score: 82/100

and pretend that explains everything.

A downtown may have:

Show the components.

48.3Define Downtown First

Before measuring downtown:

Adopt a consistent geographic boundary.

The public should know exactly what area the scorecard covers.

48.4Boundary Map

Publish a simple map.

Include:

48.5Do Not Change the Boundary Quietly

If the boundary changes:

Publish:

Do not remove weak blocks from the scorecard to improve results.

48.6Downtown Is Also a Neighbourhood

The Scorecard should not treat downtown solely as:

People:

there.

Measure downtown as a neighbourhood too.

48.7Downtown Is Also an Employment District

Track appropriate indicators of:

Do not define downtown success only by retail shops.

48.8Downtown Is Also Civic Space

Downtown contains:

Public-realm performance matters.

48.9Downtown Scorecard Headline Measures

A public headline dashboard should include a manageable set such as:

  1. Storefront vacancy.
  2. Upper-floor productive use and housing.
  3. Building permits and reinvestment.
  4. Cleanliness.
  5. Public-realm repair backlog.
  6. Lighting and street-furniture condition.
  7. Pedestrian activity.
  8. Public-space use.
  9. Civic Square use.
  10. 2nd Avenue East performance.
  11. Public washroom availability.
  12. Accessibility barriers.
  13. Parking performance.
  14. Delivery and loading functionality.
  15. Business openings and closures.
  16. Business experience.
  17. Resident experience.
  18. Safety indicators.
  19. Safety perception.
  20. Winter performance.
  21. Event use versus ordinary-day use.
  22. Downtown capital investment.
  23. Private reinvestment where measurable.
  24. River and trail connectivity.
  25. Unresolved downtown commitments.

That is enough for the first page.

More detail can sit behind it.

48.10Data Owners

Different measures may belong to:

One administrative lead should coordinate the public Downtown Scorecard.

48.11Update Frequency

Different measures need different cycles.

Cleanliness and operations

Quarterly or seasonal.

Vacancy

Semi-annually or annually.

Housing

Quarterly or annual depending on data.

Pedestrian counts

Selected comparable periods.

Business survey

Annual.

Capital projects

Quarterly.

Safety

Appropriate regular professional reporting.

Do not create data collection solely to fill a dashboard.

48.12Baseline

Year One should establish a credible downtown baseline.

Where historic data exists:

Use it.

Where it does not:

Say:

No reliable previous baseline. Measurement begins here.

48.13No Retroactive Guessing

Do not estimate:

simply because the four-year chart looks better with a baseline.

Unknown is acceptable.

48.14Ordinary-Day Principle

Many downtown measures should intentionally include:

The downtown should not be measured only when City programming has temporarily filled it.

48.15Ordinary Tuesday Test

A useful cultural test is:

What is downtown like on an ordinary Tuesday afternoon?

Ask:

This is more revealing than one festival attendance number.

48.16Winter Test

Also ask:

What is downtown like in February?

A four-season city needs a four-season scorecard.

48.17Cleanliness

Cleanliness should have a defined operational standard.

Possible categories:

48.18Cleanliness Inspection

Use periodic standardized observations.

Do not rely solely on:

48.19Complaint Volume

Complaints can supplement inspection.

But:

More complaints can mean:

Interpret carefully.

48.20Cleanliness Standard

Possible public standard:

Priority public areas inspected and maintained according to the adopted operating schedule, with significant deficiencies addressed within the appropriate service standard.

Use the actual operating standard.

48.21Cleanliness Score

If a visual condition score is used:

Publish the methodology.

For example:

Acceptable

Needs Attention

Poor

Do not let inspectors make unstructured subjective ratings without guidance.

48.22Do Not Rate People

A cleanliness score evaluates:

Not:

Human presence is not litter.

48.23Behaviour, Not Status

Public-space performance should focus on:

Not whether certain types of people are visible.

48.24No "People Moved Elsewhere" Success Metric

Do not measure downtown improvement by:

fewer visible vulnerable people

if the underlying issue was simply displaced.

That is not a legitimate downtown-performance measure.

48.25Public-Realm Maintenance

Track recurring repair needs such as:

48.26Maintenance Backlog

Show:

open

within standard

overdue

for selected downtown public-realm work.

48.27Repeat Failure

A bench fixed five times in one year may need:

Use root-cause thinking.

48.28Repair Time

Track appropriate time from identified deficiency to:

48.29Cosmetic Versus Functional

A scratched bench and an inaccessible broken curb ramp do not have equal urgency.

Prioritize:

48.30Graffiti

Track municipal response where appropriate.

Distinguish:

48.31Private Property Is Private Responsibility

The City can:

Do not count every private façade defect as a City maintenance failure.

48.32Streetscape Condition

Use a periodic streetscape condition review covering:

48.33Maintain Before Adding

A key metric should ask:

Are existing downtown public assets maintained before more are added?

48.34New Asset Burden

Whenever downtown receives:

assign:

48.35Donation Is Not Free

A donated downtown feature still creates:

considerations.

48.36Street Trees

Track:

48.37Tree Survival

A planting count alone is weak.

Where practical, track survival after:

years.

48.38Tree-Pit Function

Downtown trees interact with:

Planting should be designed for actual urban conditions.

48.39Shade

Public-space comfort may include:

Do not reduce it to a tree count.

48.40Lighting

Lighting should be measured through:

48.41More Light Is Not Automatically Better

Lighting should balance:

48.42Lighting Outage Response

Track significant public-realm outages.

48.43Repeated Lighting Failure

Repeated outage at the same location should trigger:

48.44Seating

Track public seating where it serves:

48.45Seating Quality

Ask whether seating is:

A bench count alone is not enough.

48.46Public Washrooms

Washroom access can materially affect downtown use.

Track:

48.47Washroom Uptime

Possible measure:

Percentage of scheduled public-washroom operating hours actually available.

48.48Washroom Cleanliness

Use routine operational standards.

48.49Washroom Security

Design should protect:

without unnecessary surveillance.

48.50No Camera Inside Private Spaces

Obvious, but worth stating.

Privacy remains fundamental.

48.51Washroom Accessibility

An advertised public washroom should not be counted as accessible unless it actually meets the applicable accessibility requirements.

48.52Winter Washrooms

If washrooms close seasonally:

Show that clearly.

Consider whether downtown needs some year-round public option.

48.53Wayfinding

Track whether key destinations are easy to find.

Possible destinations:

48.54Sign Clutter

Wayfinding should be:

More signs are not always better.

48.55Accessibility of Wayfinding

Consider:

48.56Digital Wayfinding

Digital tools can supplement.

They should not replace basic physical information.

48.57Storefront Vacancy

Vacancy is a central downtown measure.

But it needs a clear methodology.

48.58Define Storefront

Decide what counts as a:

Do not mix:

into a storefront vacancy rate.

48.59Vacancy Formula

A possible measure:

Storefront Vacancy Rate = Vacant Eligible Ground-Floor Commercial Storefronts ÷ Total Eligible Ground-Floor Commercial Storefronts × 100

Publish the exact definition.

48.60Vacant Means Vacant

Do not classify a storefront as occupied simply because:

Use a consistent status rule.

48.61Temporary Closure

Distinguish:

48.62Under Renovation

Track separately where useful.

A closed storefront undergoing active investment is different from long-term vacancy.

48.63Vacancy Duration

The duration of vacancy matters.

Possible categories:

Use appropriate intervals.

48.64Persistent Vacancy

Long-duration vacancy deserves more analysis than ordinary turnover.

48.65Do Not Shame Property Owners

Public vacancy reporting should generally use:

information.

Do not create a political blacklist of owners.

48.66Vacancy Cause

Where voluntary owner or public information supports it:

Analyze broad barriers such as:

Do not assume every vacancy is:

speculation.

48.67Vacancy Is Not Fully City-Controlled

The City can influence:

It cannot order private tenants to open businesses.

48.68Opening Rate

Track new businesses opening in eligible downtown premises.

48.69Closure Rate

Track businesses closing where reasonably verifiable.

48.70Opening Minus Closure Is Not Whole Economy

A new business may:

A closure may:

Interpret carefully.

48.71Relocations

Where possible:

Distinguish:

48.72No "Jobs Created by City" Claim

Do not claim City Hall created every job associated with a downtown business opening.

Business owners and employees create economic activity.

The City can improve conditions.

48.73Business Survival

If reliable data is available:

Track whether businesses remain open after:

years.

Avoid invasive collection.

48.74Survival Is Not City Attribution

Business survival depends on many factors.

Use as downtown context.

Not municipal causation.

48.75Business Mix

Monitor broad categories such as:

Do not prescribe an ideal quota.

48.76Diverse Uses

A resilient downtown often benefits from multiple:

Measure diversity descriptively.

Do not centrally plan every storefront.

48.77Ground-Floor Active Use

Where useful:

Track the share of ground-floor frontage in active public-facing use.

Define carefully.

48.78Window Appearance Is Not Enough

An attractive display does not necessarily mean:

Use real occupancy data where possible.

48.79Upper Floors

Upper-floor productive use is a major downtown indicator.

48.80Upper-Floor Categories

Possible:

Use legally available information.

48.81Upper-Floor Vacancy

Track where reliable.

Do not speculate from exterior observation alone.

48.82Upper-Floor Housing Pipeline

Measure:

inquiries

applications

approvals

permits

units under construction

occupancy

This connects Section 48 to Section 49.

48.83Approved Is Not Built

Keep these stages separate.

48.84Occupied Units Matter

The strongest housing result is:

48.85Adaptive Reuse Barriers

Track recurring barriers such as:

Separate City-controlled process from legitimate safety requirements.

48.86No Safety Weakening

Do not improve upper-floor numbers by weakening:

requirements.

48.87Building Permit Activity

Track downtown permit activity as a reinvestment indicator.

48.88Permit Value

Construction value may be useful.

But:

are not always identical.

Use proper terminology.

48.89Permit Count

Ten minor permits are not necessarily more investment than one major redevelopment.

Show count and value where useful.

48.90Building Reinvestment

Possible indicators:

48.91Public Incentives

If City incentives support redevelopment:

Show:

48.92Incentive Is Not Outcome

Approving an incentive is not the same as:

Track the result.

48.93Private Investment Attribution

Do not say:

The City invested $20 million downtown

when most of the number was private construction.

Separate:

investment.

48.94Private Investment Estimates

Use only defensible figures.

Do not multiply:

into speculative impact claims.

48.95Property Values

Property values may change during downtown improvement.

Do not claim municipal projects caused:

without credible evidence.

48.96Assessment Is Not Market Sale Price

Keep:

separate.

48.97No Streetscape Property-Value Promise

The downtown scorecard should explicitly reject:

new benches increased property values by X%

unless rigorous evidence exists.

48.98Pedestrian Activity

Pedestrian activity can be a useful measure of downtown use.

48.99Count Locations

Select stable counting points.

Use the same locations over time where possible.

48.100Comparable Time

Compare:

48.101Seasonality

A July Saturday is not comparable with a February Tuesday.

Use seasonal context.

48.102Weather

Weather can materially affect counts.

Record general conditions.

48.103Manual Counts

Simple manual counts can provide useful evidence.

Not everything requires expensive sensors.

48.104Automated Counts

If technology is used:

Review:

48.105No Facial Recognition

Pedestrian counting does not require:

Do not use it.

48.106No Individual Tracking

Do not track identifiable people across downtown simply to measure foot traffic.

48.107No Commercial Location Dossiers

Avoid purchasing detailed individual location histories where aggregate counting can answer the public question.

48.108Aggregate First

Use:

measurement wherever practical.

48.109Pedestrian Count Is Not Spending

More pedestrians do not automatically mean:

Keep measures distinct.

48.110Business Sales Data

Do not require businesses to provide:

for the Scorecard.

48.111Voluntary Aggregate Business Data

If businesses voluntarily provide anonymized trend information:

Use careful aggregation.

Small samples require caution.

48.112Business Experience Survey

Annual downtown business survey questions may include:

Is the area cleaner?

Are customers finding you?

Is parking workable?

Are deliveries workable?

Did you experience municipal process barriers?

Did you participate in downtown programs?

What is the biggest municipal issue affecting your business?

48.113Do Not Ask Businesses to Grade the Mayor

The survey measures downtown conditions.

Not political support.

48.114Survey Response Count

Always publish:

48.115Anonymous Option

Businesses should be able to provide feedback without fear of:

retaliation.

48.116No Favourites

Do not treat businesses supportive of downtown initiatives differently from critics.

48.117Resident Survey

Downtown residents should also be asked periodically about:

48.118Residents Are Not Visitors

A successful downtown must remain livable.

Event programming should not make ordinary residential life impossible.

48.119Noise

Where event or nightlife noise becomes a recurring issue:

Track complaints and operating context.

Apply neutral standards.

48.120Quiet Is Not the Only Goal

Downtown is expected to have:

Balance:

48.121Family Use

Measure whether families can comfortably use:

48.122Child-Friendly Does Not Mean Child-Only

Downtown should work for:

48.123Seniors

Assess:

48.124Accessibility

Downtown accessibility deserves a dedicated subsection.

48.125Accessibility Barrier Inventory

Track significant barriers such as:

48.126Private Building Accessibility

The City can:

Do not classify every private building barrier as a City-owned infrastructure defect.

48.127Accessibility Fix Status

Possible:

Fixed

Scheduled

Requires Major Capital

Private / Outside City Authority

Under Review

48.128Accessibility Completion

Do not count:

as barrier removed.

Measure completed work separately.

48.129Winter Accessibility

A curb ramp buried in snow is not accessible in practice.

Review winter routes.

48.130Snow Storage

Track recurring downtown snow-storage problems.

48.131Sidewalk Winter Standard

Use the applicable City service standard.

48.132Business Entrance Snow

Private-property responsibilities remain private where applicable.

Public communication should make responsibilities clear.

48.133Transit Access

Track convenient connection between:

48.134Transit Stop Accessibility

Review:

48.135Cycling

Track practical:

Do not count unused racks as success by themselves.

48.136Bicycle Parking Use

Periodic observation can help determine whether capacity is adequate.

48.137River Connection

Measure whether downtown connects better to:

48.138Connectivity Is More Than Signage

A sign saying:

River this way

does not solve:

routes.

48.139Trail Connection

Track missing links and completed connections.

48.140Private Property

Do not count proposed links over private property as public access.

48.141Parking

Parking should be measured rather than debated entirely through anecdotes.

48.142Parking Supply

Maintain current inventory of:

where appropriate.

48.143Parking Occupancy

Periodic occupancy counts can show:

48.144Full Is Not Always Good

A parking area operating at 100% occupancy may create:

48.145Empty Is Not Always Good

Large empty parking areas may indicate:

48.146No Arbitrary Universal Target

Use context for:

Do not adopt a fashionable percentage merely because another city uses it.

48.147Duration

Where relevant:

Measure turnover and length of stay.

48.148Employee Parking

Downtown parking issues may differ for:

Understand each group.

48.149Accessible Parking

Track:

48.150Loading

Businesses need functional:

access.

48.151Delivery Survey

Ask businesses whether loading arrangements work.

Especially when street configuration changes.

48.152Illegal Loading

Recurring illegal loading may indicate:

Investigate cause.

48.153Parking Revenue

Finance may track revenue.

Do not make revenue the sole purpose of parking policy.

48.154Parking Cost

Also show:

48.155Free Parking Is Not Free Infrastructure

Even without a user fee:

Parking has:

cost.

48.156Paid Parking Is Not Automatically Better

Use evidence.

48.157Parking Policy Test

Ask:

Does parking support access to downtown without consuming more land than necessary?

48.1582nd Avenue East

The 2nd Avenue East pilot or long-term model deserves its own transparent scorecard.

48.159Separate Pilot From Permanent Infrastructure

Track:

temporary operating pilot

separately from

permanent capital redesign.

48.160Baseline Before Change

Before a pilot or permanent change:

Record comparable:

48.161During-Pilot Data

Use the same methodology.

48.162After-Pilot Data

Compare fairly.

48.1632nd Avenue Measures

Possible:

  1. pedestrian counts;
  2. vehicle counts on affected and nearby streets;
  3. parking utilization;
  4. loading functionality;
  5. business feedback;
  6. resident feedback;
  7. accessibility;
  8. emergency access;
  9. transit effects;
  10. maintenance cost;
  11. event use;
  12. ordinary-day use.

48.164Traffic Diversion

Do not claim traffic disappeared if it simply moved to:

Measure nearby effects where justified.

48.165Business Feedback Can Be Mixed

Publish:

results honestly.

48.166No Sales-Data Requirement

Again:

Businesses should not have to provide private revenue information to participate in policy discussion.

48.167Emergency Access

Confirm through appropriate professional review.

Do not leave it as political assertion.

48.168Delivery Access

Test with actual businesses.

48.169Accessibility

Observe the full route.

Temporary barriers and furniture can create obstacles.

48.170Weather

A summer pedestrian pilot does not answer:

How should the permanent street operate in winter?

Separate the question.

48.171Permanent Decision Gate

At the end of sufficient testing:

Choose:

Return to conventional operation

Repeat seasonal model

Modify

Permanent redesign

No automatic outcome.

48.172No Sunk-Cost Street

Money spent on:

does not justify a permanent street configuration if evidence is weak.

48.173Civic Square

Civic Square should be measured as:

Not merely as a campaign promise.

48.174Civic Square Baseline

Before major permanent investment:

Measure current public-space use.

48.175Ordinary-Day Use

Track:

through periodic observations where appropriate.

48.176Event Use

Track separately:

48.177Event Attendance Is Not Ordinary Use

A square used by 5,000 people at one festival but nearly empty the rest of the year has a different performance profile from a square used daily.

Show both.

48.178Programmed Versus Unprogrammed Use

Distinguish:

Programmed

City or partner events.

Unprogrammed

Ordinary spontaneous public use.

Both matter.

48.179Civic Square Cost

Show:

48.180Cost per Event Is Not Enough

Public space creates:

value too.

Use multiple measures.

48.181Temporary Model

If temporary infrastructure works well:

That may be success.

Permanent expensive construction is not required to prove commitment.

48.182Permanent Capital Gate

Before major construction:

Show:

ordinary use

event use

accessibility

maintenance

winter function

complete cost

public feedback

funding

48.183Civic Square Accessibility

Measure routes through:

48.184Civic Square Winter

Evaluate:

48.185Civic Square Neutrality

Public-space programming should follow viewpoint-neutral lawful rules.

48.186No Campaign Square

The Civic Square should not become:

48.187Event Metrics

Downtown events deserve measurement.

But not as the entire economic-development strategy.

48.188Event Count

Track number of event days.

48.189Attendance

Use reasonable estimates.

Avoid fake precision.

48.190Attendance Methodology

Possible:

Label the source.

48.191Free Event Estimate

Do not report:

12,437 attendees

from a casual visual estimate.

Use ranges where appropriate.

48.192Event Cost

Track material City:

costs.

48.193Event Revenue

If events generate:

show where material.

48.194Event Economic Impact

Do not claim:

$4 million economic impact

without a credible methodology.

48.195Local Business Benefit

Use:

carefully.

48.196Event Disruption

Events may also create:

Measure important negative effects too.

48.197Event Equity

Do not allocate public resources only to:

events.

Use neutral rules.

48.198Event Sustainability

A successful event may become:

City ownership is not always necessary.

48.199Public Space Calendar

Track how often significant civic spaces are:

48.200Overprogramming

Too many booked events can reduce ordinary public use.

Balance.

48.201Public Space Should Still Be Public

Residents should be able to use downtown public spaces without:

48.202Safety

Downtown safety must separate:

actual incidents

from

perception.

Both matter.

They are not the same measure.

48.203Actual Safety

Use professionally maintained public-safety data.

48.204Perceived Safety

Survey residents, businesses and visitors with stable questions.

Example:

How comfortable do you feel walking downtown during the day?

and

during the evening?

48.205Perception Is Real Experience

Even if incident rates improve:

Poor perception can reduce downtown use.

48.206Perception Is Not Crime Data

Do not say:

crime is up

because survey fear increased.

48.207Crime Data Is Not Complete Experience

Likewise:

A low incident count does not mean:

concerns are irrelevant.

Use multiple evidence sources.

48.208No Political Crime Statistic

Do not choose one offence category or month to support a campaign narrative.

48.209Repeat Locations

Where appropriate:

Repeated calls or incidents may identify:

issues.

Use professional analysis.

48.210Do Not Publicly Shame Addresses

Public reporting should protect:

48.211Lighting and Safety

Track whether identified lighting deficiencies are corrected.

Do not automatically assume:

48.212Environmental Design

Physical design can affect:

Use qualified analysis.

48.213Cameras

Cameras should not be the default response to perception issues.

48.214Camera Decision

Where proposed:

Require:

48.215No Facial Recognition Default

The downtown Scorecard should not reward surveillance expansion.

48.216Community Safety Partners

Where community organizations support:

work:

Measure actual service outcomes appropriately.

48.217Downtown Safety Is Shared

Police alone do not determine downtown conditions.

Other factors include:

48.218Safety Dividend

Any financial Safety Dividend belongs in Sections 44 and 51.

Do not count it twice in the Downtown Scorecard.

48.219Downtown Churches and Community Organizations

Where community or faith organizations participate in downtown support:

Use the same partnership standards as elsewhere.

48.220Public Benefit

Measure:

Not:

48.221Equal Service

Publicly supported assistance remains available regardless of:

48.222Faith Is Not a Downtown Problem

A lawful church, mosque, temple, community group or other institution should be treated under neutral land-use and public-service rules.

48.223Behaviour Standards Apply Equally

Focus on:

Not belief.

48.224Homelessness

Grey County may have important responsibilities in housing and homelessness.

The downtown Scorecard should accurately identify:

48.225No Shadow Homelessness Department

If another government has lead responsibility:

The City should not duplicate it unnecessarily.

48.226Downtown Impact

The City can still measure impacts relevant to its responsibilities such as:

48.227Do Not Count Displacement as Resolution

If a person moves one block away:

The underlying issue is not solved.

48.228Housing Connection

Track downtown housing as one part of a broader healthy-neighbourhood strategy.

48.229Residential Population

Where reliable public data exists:

Track downtown residential population or occupied housing units.

48.230Do Not Guess Residents From Utility Accounts

Use appropriate data sources and privacy rules.

48.231Residential Growth

More residents can strengthen:

But growth also creates:

needs.

Measure both.

48.232Grocery and Everyday Needs

A downtown neighbourhood benefits from access to:

Do not promise City Hall will create private businesses.

Track service gaps descriptively.

48.233Essential-Service Gap

Where a common need is missing:

The Start-Up Desk or economic-development work can identify it as:

Not a municipal operating mandate.

48.234Public Investment

Track City capital and operating investment downtown.

48.235Separate Capital and Operating

A $5 million reconstruction and a $75,000 annual maintenance budget are different.

Show both.

48.236Outside Public Investment

Track County, Ontario or Canada funding where relevant.

48.237Private Investment

Track separately.

48.238No Gross Number Without Breakdown

Do not announce:

$40 million invested downtown

unless residents can see:

components.

48.239Cost per Improvement

For selected small public-realm projects:

Track complete cost.

This can help compare:

approaches.

48.240Maintenance Cost Growth

As new downtown assets are added:

Track annual maintenance cost.

48.241No Free Beautification

Every improvement creates:

48.242Public Art

Track:

where City-owned.

48.243Art Is Not Economic Development Metric

Do not claim:

created a specific economic return without evidence.

Its public value may be:

That is enough.

48.244Cultural Programming

Track participation and cost where City-supported.

Cross-reference recreation and community partnership sections.

48.245Tourism

Visitor activity can support downtown.

But tourism data often covers a broader region.

48.246Do Not Call Regional Tourism Downtown Foot Traffic

Use the correct geographic scope.

48.247Visitor Survey

If conducted:

Ask how people discovered:

Use aggregate data.

48.248Visitor Is Not Resident

A healthy downtown serves both.

Do not optimize entirely for tourists.

48.249Local Spending Retention

Shop Local programs may support downtown businesses.

The Downtown Scorecard should reference results from Section 50 rather than count the same outcome twice.

48.250Economic Attribution Firewall

For every major downtown economic claim:

Ask:

Do we know the City's policy caused this result, contributed to it, or merely occurred at the same time?

Use the correct wording.

48.251Caused

Use only where evidence is strong.

48.252Contributed

Often more appropriate.

48.253Coincided

Sometimes the City should simply say:

This changed during the period.

No attribution.

48.254No Property-Value Victory Metric

Do not use broad property appreciation as the core downtown score.

Too many outside variables affect it.

48.255No Business-Turnover Panic Metric

Businesses naturally:

Look for trend and persistence.

48.256Vacancy Plus Reinvestment

A better picture combines:

48.257Ordinary-Day Foot Traffic Plus Events

Likewise:

Both.

48.258Safety Incidents Plus Perception

Both.

48.259Public Investment Plus Maintenance

Both.

48.260Business Feedback Plus Resident Feedback

Both.

48.261Downtown Scorecard Table

A recommended headline table:

MeasureBaselineCurrentTarget / StandardTrendStatusOwner

Possible rows:

48.262Vacancy Table

MeasureBaselineCurrentChange

Possible:

48.263Upper-Floor Table

StatusUnits / SpacesCurrent PipelineNote

Possible:

Use only reliable information.

48.264Public Realm Table

Asset / ServiceStandardCurrent PerformanceBacklogTrend

Possible:

48.265Civic Square Table

MeasureBaselineCurrentCostTrend

Possible:

48.2662nd Avenue Table

MeasureBeforePilot / CurrentChangeNote

Possible:

48.267Safety Table

MeasureBaselineCurrentTrendSource

Keep actual incidents and perception separate.

48.268Investment Table

Investment TypeCityOther PublicPrivate Where VerifiedStatus

No combined headline without breakdown.

48.269Anti-Gaming Rule One

Do not change the downtown boundary to improve the vacancy rate.

48.270Anti-Gaming Rule Two

Do not classify long-term vacant storefronts as:

because a temporary display was placed in the window.

48.271Anti-Gaming Rule Three

Do not classify:

as completed housing.

48.272Anti-Gaming Rule Four

Do not classify:

as City investment.

48.273Anti-Gaming Rule Five

Do not classify:

as ordinary daily foot traffic.

48.274Anti-Gaming Rule Six

Do not count the same attendee across several event days as a unique downtown visitor unless methodology supports it.

48.275Anti-Gaming Rule Seven

Do not claim increased foot traffic proves increased sales.

48.276Anti-Gaming Rule Eight

Do not require private sales data from businesses to validate a municipal pilot.

48.277Anti-Gaming Rule Nine

Do not measure downtown safety solely through perception surveys.

48.278Anti-Gaming Rule Ten

Do not measure downtown safety solely through one crime category.

48.279Anti-Gaming Rule Eleven

Do not count vulnerable people moved elsewhere as:

48.280Anti-Gaming Rule Twelve

Do not claim property values rose because of a City project without credible evidence.

48.281Anti-Gaming Rule Thirteen

Do not call parking successful merely because it is:

48.282Anti-Gaming Rule Fourteen

Do not call parking successful merely because it is:

48.283Anti-Gaming Rule Fifteen

Do not call Civic Square successful solely because one large event occurred.

48.284Anti-Gaming Rule Sixteen

Do not call Civic Square unsuccessful solely because ordinary use is low during severe winter weather.

Use context.

48.285Anti-Gaming Rule Seventeen

Do not count public-realm assets installed without counting future maintenance.

48.286Anti-Gaming Rule Eighteen

Do not count temporary repairs as permanent improvement.

48.287Anti-Gaming Rule Nineteen

Do not count 2nd Avenue traffic displaced to surrounding streets as:

without measuring nearby effects.

48.288Anti-Gaming Rule Twenty

Do not change pedestrian-count locations or times without disclosing the change.

48.289Traffic Lights

If status colours are used:

Green

Meeting the published standard or improving within expected range.

Amber

Attention required.

Red

Material corrective action or decision required.

Grey

Data insufficient.

Publish thresholds.

48.290Grey Can Be Useful

If upper-floor vacancy is not reliably known:

Grey is better than invented data.

48.291Red Is Not "Downtown Failed"

A single Red measure means:

Avoid simplistic headline grades.

48.292Trend Matters

A Red vacancy rate declining steadily can still indicate improvement.

Show:

48.293Seasonal Dashboard

For selected measures:

Consider seasonal reporting:

Winter

Spring

Summer

Fall

This may be more meaningful for:

48.294Four-Year Trend

Where comparable:

MeasureBaselineYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4

Strong candidates:

48.295Do Not Expect Every Measure to Improve

More downtown residents may produce:

More activity may create:

Interpret the system.

48.296Tradeoffs

A stronger downtown may require balancing:

No single constituency gets everything.

48.297Business Versus Resident Conflict

If an event benefits businesses but severely disrupts residents:

Measure both.

Then decide.

48.298Vehicle Versus Pedestrian Conflict

Likewise.

48.299Parking Versus Public Space

Likewise.

48.300Maintenance Versus New Capital

Likewise.

48.301Public Consultation

Use public engagement where choices exist.

Do not ask residents to vote on:

48.302Downtown Business Table

Maintain a regular forum or survey process.

Do not require participation to receive normal City service.

48.303Downtown Residents

Give residents a route for input independent from:

48.304Youth

Ask young people how they use downtown.

Do not create permanent profiles.

48.305Seniors

Include senior mobility experience.

48.306Accessibility Community

Include lived-experience testing.

48.307Community Organizations

Include relevant service and cultural partners.

48.308Property Owners

Engage property owners on:

48.309Renters

Downtown renters are residents too.

Do not treat only property owners as neighbourhood stakeholders.

48.310Event Organizers

Include operational feedback.

48.311Delivery Operators

Where major street changes occur:

Ask those making:

48.312Emergency Services

Include professional operational needs in street-design decisions.

48.313Public Works

Ensure designs can actually be:

48.314Finance

Every permanent downtown improvement needs:

48.315Planning

Land-use changes need:

48.316No Mayor-by-Design

The Mayor can advocate.

The Mayor should not personally design:

systems against professional advice.

48.317Design Professionals

Use qualified professionals where:

needs justify it.

48.318Local Knowledge

Professional design should still listen to:

48.319Downtown Capital Projects

Every major downtown capital project should use Section 47's standard project card.

No special exemption because:

48.320Capital Cost

Show:

48.321Operating Cost

Show:

48.322Capital Delay

Explain.

48.323Scope Change

Explain.

48.324Public Benefit

State the intended outcome before construction.

Examples:

Then measure it.

48.325No Post-Hoc Goal Change

Do not change the project's stated purpose after completion because the original outcome was weak.

48.326Pilot Before Permanent

Where practical:

Test:

versions first.

This remains central to:

48.327Pilot Cost

Pilots still cost money.

Publish it.

48.328Pilot Removal Cost

Include cost to:

where relevant.

48.329Pilot Failure Is Useful

A failed $50,000 pilot can prevent a failed $5 million permanent project.

That can be good value.

48.330Pilot Success Is Not Automatic Capital Approval

The permanent option still needs:

48.331Winter Before Permanent

Permanent downtown designs should be evaluated under:

48.332Deliveries Before Permanent

Likewise.

48.333Accessibility Before Permanent

Likewise.

48.334Maintenance Before Permanent

Likewise.

48.335Event Use Before Permanent

Likewise.

48.336Ordinary-Day Use Before Permanent

Especially.

48.337Downtown Housing and Night Activity

More residents and hospitality can create competing needs.

Track:

without assuming one side is wrong.

48.338Mixed-Use Means Mixed Needs

Downtown policy should accommodate:

through clear rules.

48.339Public Realm and Private Patios

If patios use public space:

Track:

48.340Patio Success

Do not judge only by:

Ask whether the public route still functions.

48.341Seasonal Patios

Measure seasonal operating issues.

48.342Snow and Storage

Temporary infrastructure needs:

plans.

48.343Street Furniture Storage

Include complete cost.

48.344Waste Collection

Track whether downtown waste infrastructure meets actual demand.

48.345Business Waste

Private commercial waste responsibility should remain clear.

48.346Special Event Waste

Event operators should have:

48.347Recycling

Where public recycling is offered:

Measure contamination and use if the data is meaningful.

Do not add bins solely to create a green metric.

48.348Public Wi-Fi

If downtown public Wi-Fi exists:

Track:

in the Safe Information framework.

48.349Wi-Fi Use Is Not Foot Traffic

A connected device count does not equal:

Do not conflate them.

48.350No Wi-Fi Tracking of Movement

Do not use public Wi-Fi to build:

48.351Community Calendar

Downtown events should feed into the open calendar under the same neutral rules as other community events.

48.352No Paid Basic Ranking

Public calendar visibility should not favour:

that pay the City for ordinary basic placement.

48.353Downtown Information

Keep:

current.

48.354Closure Information

Street closures should be announced with:

48.355Construction Communication

Downtown businesses need advance notice of major:

work where possible.

48.356Construction Disruption

Measure significant impacts such as:

Do not promise zero disruption.

48.357Business Mitigation

Where major City construction affects access:

Use practical:

48.358No Compensation Promise by Default

Construction inconvenience does not automatically create a City compensation entitlement.

Follow law and policy.

48.359Construction Completion

After major work:

Ask businesses and residents what operational lessons should inform the next project.

48.360Downtown Communications

Avoid constant:

The scorecard should show:

48.361Marketing Is Not Measurement

A campaign:

Downtown is thriving

does not belong in the measurement column.

48.362Promotion Has a Role

Economic development can promote downtown.

The Scorecard remains factual.

48.363Election-Year Integrity

Year Four downtown reporting should follow the same:

48.364No Festival Timing Manipulation

Do not schedule final measurement only during:

Use comparable periods.

48.365No Vacancy Reclassification Before Election

Maintain methodology.

48.366No Delayed Safety Data

Publish on normal schedule.

48.367No Premature Capital Completion

Do not mark:

complete

before the project truly reaches the defined completion stage.

48.368No Political Opening Count

Do not count businesses that:

48.369No Selective Photograph Scorecard

A few attractive photographs can illustrate.

They do not replace:

48.370Public Can Disagree

Residents may review the same evidence and conclude:

The City's job is to provide the evidence.

48.371Four-Year Downtown Audit

At the end of the term, publish:

Storefront vacancy change

Long-term vacancy change

Upper-floor housing

Building reinvestment

Cleanliness

Maintenance

Accessibility

Pedestrian activity

Parking

Civic Square

2nd Avenue

Safety

Business experience

Resident experience

City investment

Remaining liabilities

Projects continuing into next term

48.372Name the Biggest Downtown Improvement

Use evidence.

48.373Name the Biggest Downtown Failure

Use evidence.

48.374Name the Most Persistent Vacancy Problem

Describe the pattern.

Do not shame an owner.

48.375Name the Most Successful Public-Space Change

Show:

48.376Name a Public-Space Change That Did Not Work

Stop or modify it.

48.377Name the Biggest Accessibility Improvement

Show what barrier was removed.

48.378Name the Biggest Remaining Accessibility Barrier

Put it into the next plan.

48.379Name the Biggest Business Process Improvement

Likely connected to:

48.380Name the Biggest Construction Disruption Lesson

Document it.

48.381Name the Largest Downtown Capital Liability

Future Councils need to know.

48.382Name the Most Important Ordinary-Day Improvement

This may be:

Not necessarily a large capital project.

48.383Four-Year Vacancy Test

Ask:

Are fewer storefronts sitting empty for long periods?

48.384Housing Test

Ask:

Did more upper-floor space become lawful occupied housing or productive use?

48.385Maintenance Test

Ask:

Is the downtown public realm better maintained on ordinary days?

48.386Accessibility Test

Ask:

Can more people navigate downtown independently?

48.387Public Space Test

Ask:

Are civic spaces useful when no event is happening?

48.388Civic Square Test

Ask:

Did its public use justify its complete cost?

48.3892nd Avenue Test

Ask:

Did the final operating model improve downtown function across pedestrian, business, transportation and accessibility needs?

48.390Parking Test

Ask:

Can people generally find appropriate parking without dedicating more downtown land than necessary?

48.391Delivery Test

Ask:

Can businesses receive goods under the chosen street design?

48.392Safety Test

Ask:

Did actual safety and perceived safety improve, and where did they diverge?

48.393Business Test

Ask:

Do downtown businesses report a clearer municipal operating environment?

48.394Resident Test

Ask:

Is downtown becoming a better neighbourhood as well as a commercial district?

48.395Winter Test

Ask:

Does the downtown work in winter, not just summer?

48.396Investment Test

Ask:

Did public investment lead to the intended public outcomes?

Not:

Did we spend a lot?

48.397Causation Test

Ask:

Are we claiming only what the evidence allows us to claim?

48.398Maintenance Tail Test

Ask:

Can the City afford to maintain everything it added?

48.399Institution Test

Ask:

Will the downtown operating standards continue if the Mayor changes?

48.400What Success Looks Like

Downtown success does not require:

It means:

48.401What Failure Looks Like

Failure includes:

48.402The Downtown Scorecard Commitment

Owen Sound should commit to:

Define the downtown boundary clearly and keep it stable for comparison.

Never change the boundary quietly to improve results.

Measure downtown as a neighbourhood, employment district, commercial area and civic space.

Measure ordinary weekdays as well as special events.

Measure winter as well as summer.

Maintain clear cleanliness standards.

Use standardized observations rather than complaints alone.

Never treat the presence of vulnerable people as a cleanliness metric.

Focus public-space enforcement on behaviour rather than status.

Never count displacement of people as resolution of the underlying problem.

Track public-realm repair backlog and recurring failures.

Prioritize safety and accessibility over cosmetic defects.

Maintain lighting, seating, waste receptacles and other public assets after installation.

Give every new downtown asset a maintenance owner and lifecycle cost.

Track tree survival rather than planting counts alone.

Measure lighting outages without assuming more light always means better safety.

Measure seating by usefulness, not just quantity.

Publish public-washroom locations, hours, accessibility and significant closures.

Treat washroom availability as part of downtown accessibility and ordinary use.

Maintain physical wayfinding alongside digital information.

Define storefront vacancy consistently.

Distinguish genuine vacancy, temporary closure and active renovation.

Track long-duration vacancy separately from normal turnover.

Do not publicly shame individual property owners.

Investigate recurring vacancy barriers without assuming one cause.

Recognize that private tenancy decisions are not fully controlled by City Hall.

Track business openings, closures, relocations and expansions where reliable.

Never claim the City created every business or job that appeared during the term.

Track business survival only where reliable and without claiming municipal causation.

Monitor business mix without centrally prescribing an ideal storefront quota.

Measure upper-floor housing and productive use.

Separate inquiry, approval, permit, construction and occupancy.

Never count approved housing as completed housing.

Track adaptive-reuse barriers while preserving legitimate life-safety requirements.

Measure building-permit activity carefully and distinguish permit value from actual verified investment.

Separate City, other public and private investment.

Never claim property-value appreciation as a City result without credible evidence.

Measure pedestrian activity through stable locations and comparable periods.

Record season and weather context.

Use simple manual counts where they answer the question adequately.

If technology is used for pedestrian counts, require accuracy, privacy and complete-cost review.

Never use facial recognition to count pedestrians.

Do not track identifiable residents through downtown merely to measure foot traffic.

Never treat pedestrian count as direct proof of sales.

Never require private business sales or tax data to evaluate municipal downtown policy.

Use voluntary aggregate business feedback carefully.

Survey downtown businesses about municipal conditions rather than political approval.

Publish survey response counts and limitations.

Give downtown businesses a safe route to criticize City policy without fear of retaliation.

Survey downtown residents independently from business organizations.

Balance nightlife and event activity with residential livability.

Include families, seniors and people with disabilities in downtown-use evaluation.

Maintain an accessibility barrier inventory.

Distinguish City-owned accessibility barriers from private-property issues.

Count accessibility improvements only when barriers are actually removed.

Evaluate winter accessibility in real conditions.

Track transit-stop accessibility and downtown regional connections where relevant.

Evaluate cycling infrastructure by usefulness rather than rack counts alone.

Measure connectivity between downtown, the river, trails and harbour.

Never show private property as public trail access.

Measure parking through actual supply, occupancy and user needs rather than anecdotes alone.

Never assume 100% parking occupancy is ideal.

Never assume empty parking is success.

Use different parking needs for visitors, employees, residents, loading and accessibility.

Track delivery and loading functionality.

Treat repeated illegal loading as a possible design problem as well as an enforcement problem.

Show parking revenue together with operating cost where useful.

Remember that free parking still has a public cost.

Measure 2nd Avenue East before, during and after pilot changes using comparable methods.

Track traffic displacement to surrounding streets where justified.

Publish mixed business feedback honestly.

Do not require sales data to participate in the 2nd Avenue review.

Verify emergency, delivery, accessibility and winter function before permanent redesign.

Keep Return to Conventional Operation as a legitimate 2nd Avenue outcome.

Never let pilot spending create a sunk-cost argument for permanence.

Measure Civic Square on ordinary days as well as event days.

Separate programmed from spontaneous public-space use.

Publish Civic Square capital, maintenance and programming costs.

Allow a successful temporary Civic Square design to remain temporary or modular if that provides the best value.

Require ordinary use, accessibility, winter function and complete cost before major permanent Civic Square investment.

Keep Civic Square programming viewpoint-neutral and lawful.

Never convert Civic Square into incumbent campaign infrastructure.

Measure events separately from ordinary downtown activity.

Use credible event-attendance estimates and label the methodology.

Do not invent false precision for free-event attendance.

Publish material City event-support costs.

Do not claim economic-impact numbers without defensible methodology.

Measure negative event effects such as noise, deliveries and traffic as well as benefits.

Use neutral event-support rules.

Keep public spaces available for ordinary public use as well as programmed events.

Separate actual safety information from perceived safety.

Measure both daytime and evening comfort where useful.

Do not call rising fear a crime increase.

Do not dismiss perception simply because incident data is stable.

Do not select one crime category or one month to create a political narrative.

Protect victims and sensitive locations in public safety reporting.

Do not assume every safety concern requires more surveillance.

Require evidence, purpose, privacy and retention rules before installing cameras.

Do not use facial recognition as the default downtown safety tool.

Recognize that maintenance, housing, crisis response, public-space design and business activity also affect downtown safety.

Treat churches and other community organizations under neutral partnership and land-use rules.

Keep publicly supported service available without religious or political conditions.

Distinguish Owen Sound's role from Grey County's responsibilities in housing and homelessness.

Do not create a duplicate municipal homelessness bureaucracy where another government already carries the lead responsibility.

Do not call movement of vulnerable residents from one block to another a solved problem.

Measure downtown residential growth using reliable, privacy-respecting information.

Track everyday service gaps as potential business opportunities rather than automatically creating City-operated businesses.

Separate City, other public and private downtown investment.

Never use one gross investment number without showing who actually invested the money.

Measure ongoing maintenance cost as downtown assets expand.

Treat public art and cultural assets according to their real civic purpose rather than inventing economic returns.

Do not confuse regional tourism statistics with downtown activity.

Serve visitors without designing downtown only for tourists.

Cross-reference Shop Local results rather than counting them twice.

Use an economic-attribution firewall for every major claim.

Distinguish caused, contributed and coincided.

Do not use property values as the main downtown score.

Do not use business turnover alone as the main downtown score.

Read vacancy, reinvestment, public realm, foot traffic, safety and lived experience together.

Publish transparent headline tables for vacancy, upper floors, public realm, Civic Square, 2nd Avenue, safety and investment.

Never reclassify vacant storefronts before an election to improve the score.

Never count a permit as a completed redevelopment.

Never count festival attendance as daily downtown use.

Never count more pedestrians as guaranteed increased sales.

Never count displacement of vulnerable people as downtown improvement.

Never claim property-value gains that the evidence cannot attribute to City policy.

Never label Civic Square successful because of one large event.

Never label 2nd Avenue successful because vehicle traffic moved onto another street.

Use stable pedestrian-count locations and measurement periods.

Publish the rules behind any Green, Amber, Red or Grey status.

Accept Grey when data is genuinely unavailable.

Do not reduce downtown health to one grade.

Use seasonal reporting for measures where season matters.

Recognize that improvement in one downtown goal may create pressure in another.

Make tradeoffs visible.

Give businesses, residents, renters, property owners, youth, seniors, accessibility advocates, event organizers and operators appropriate routes to provide input.

Do not condition normal municipal service on participating in downtown initiatives.

Use professionals for technical design while incorporating practical local knowledge.

Apply ordinary capital-project accountability to every major downtown project.

State the intended public outcome before building.

Do not rewrite a project's purpose after completion to manufacture success.

Use reversible pilots before large permanent changes where practical.

Publish pilot costs and removal costs.

Treat a failed inexpensive pilot as potentially valuable learning.

Never treat a successful pilot as automatic approval for permanent capital.

Test permanent designs against winter, deliveries, accessibility, maintenance and ordinary-day use.

Manage the tension between downtown housing and nightlife through clear neutral rules.

Ensure patios and seasonal uses preserve accessible pedestrian routes.

Include storage and off-season costs for temporary downtown assets.

Maintain clear responsibilities for public and private waste.

Do not confuse public Wi-Fi connections with unique downtown visitors.

Never track individual downtown movement through public Wi-Fi.

Keep public event information current under neutral Community Calendar rules.

Publish road closures and construction disruption clearly.

Give businesses reasonable advance notice of major City construction where possible.

Do not promise zero construction disruption.

Keep downtown promotion separate from downtown measurement.

Use the same downtown boundary and definitions throughout the election year.

Do not manipulate measurement dates around campaign events.

Do not delay negative safety, vacancy or business information because an election is approaching.

Do not mark capital work complete before it reaches the defined completion stage.

Publish the four-year Downtown Audit with successes, failures, ongoing costs and unresolved liabilities.

Name the biggest improvement and biggest failure.

Name the most persistent vacancy challenge.

Name the most successful public-space change and one that did not work.

Name the largest remaining accessibility barrier.

Name the largest downtown capital liability being handed to the next Council.

Judge the final record by whether downtown became better on an ordinary day, not merely whether it produced good photographs.

The Downtown Scorecard should make it possible for a resident to walk through downtown and compare lived experience with the public record.

They should be able to ask:

Are there fewer long-term vacant storefronts?

Are more upper floors occupied?

Are the sidewalks better maintained?

Can I find a public washroom?

Can a senior sit down?

Can someone using a mobility device move through the area?

Can businesses receive deliveries?

Can people park without turning the downtown into a parking lot?

Does Civic Square work when there is no festival?

Did 2nd Avenue actually perform better?

Does downtown feel safer, and does the evidence support that?

Did public investment create public use?

Can the City afford to maintain what it built?

The best downtown improvement may not be the biggest project.

It may be:

That is why the Scorecard must measure the ordinary day.

Count the vacancies. Count the homes. Count the use. Fix the maintenance. Measure the access. Listen to businesses and residents. Separate evidence from promotion. Build only what Owen Sound can maintain.

← Chapter 47: Infrastructure: The Public Infrastructure ScorecardChapter 49: Housing: The Public Housing Scorecard →